🔗 Share this article

Turns out he endured losing against Grimsby. Survive an important European final versus one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, squandering some of the club’s best academy products, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to tango. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' championship 1994-95 season, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. The most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated at his players for losing individual battles crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of a England's top division's most feared football executives.

And frankly, this entire bruising episode seems to paint the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his nine months of experience at Southampton, to view Jason Wilcox as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: a man whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring United’s feted manager, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless Dan Ashworth earlier, he has demonstrated to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which the club's mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Conflict Over System and Philosophy

For example, it was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim in the first place, played a key role in attempting to convince him to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties met a certain resistance. However, these judgements carry more weight when delivered from the mouth with the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time he might agree to explain his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is walking away with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause in place. The director seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – men like Jason Wilcox – simply operate on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not equivalent to being ready to receive.

An Supreme Power In Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his ultimate superior the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to adopt analytics and analytics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he declared that United’s style of play “will be decided in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in industry and sailing. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply superior. Whom else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a modern arena that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

A New Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Over Coaches

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent in top-tier of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once possible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to join a club and implement their plan through to completion. But how many businesses have these guys set up? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive professional resumes. Better by far to determine the tactics in the boardroom and hire a coach who can tailor their methods to suit. If managers were once chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the product, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his standing damaged while those individuals who appointed him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Neoliberal Football: Responsibility for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism at work: the elevation of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose decisions remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the system coach only to dismiss him for playing excessively 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and then bin him for requiring too long. And above all be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.